Former president Jacob Zuma, in a desperate battle to avoid paying back about R16m in legal fees incurred by taxpayers in his fight to avoid corruption charges, has accused the judges who ordered him to repay the funds of political bias.
Zuma, who is also facing a lawsuit from former minister Derek Hanekom after he suggested the latter had been an apartheid spy, has filed papers challenging the 2018 ruling by the high court in Pretoria.
He says the courts should “never” criticise or condemn him over his multiple legal bids. Forcing him to pay back the money is an unfair violation of his constitutional rights, he says.
Zuma says he should be allowed to appeal the funding ruling, which has left him “unable to pay my legal costs” and “placed my legal defence at risk”.
He denies using a strategy to avoid trial: “I have not engaged in any litigation strategy intended to avoid accountability.
You might also like…Legal battle between Old Mutual and Moyo continues
The South Gauteng High Court will hear round two of the legal battle involving Old Mutual and on-and-off-again CEO Peter Moyo.
This time the Johannesburg court will decide whether Moyo should immediately return to work, despite a pending appeal …Read more
The post How do you feel about paying Jacob Zuma’s lawyers? appeared first on News365.co.za.